Certificate of Analysis (COA)

Every batch of CREG+ is tested before it ships, and each pouch ties to a released Certificate of Analysis (COA). We test the creatine content (the label dose), heavy metals, and microbiological safety, so you can confirm the 5 g dose is real and the product is clean.

Download the full Certificate of Analysis (PDF) — Batch 20260125A

What we test, every batch

  • Creatine content — confirms each sachet delivers its 5 g label dose of creatine monohydrate.
  • Heavy metals — lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury, screened against safe limits.
  • Microbiological safety — pathogens (E. coli, Salmonella, S. aureus) and yeast/mould.

Representative results — batch 20260125A

Test Result Status
Creatine per sachet 5.00 g (99.6% of 5 g label) Pass
Creatine monohydrate assay 99.4% Pass
Lead (Pb) Below limit Pass
Arsenic (As) Below limit Pass
Cadmium (Cd) Below limit Pass
Mercury (Hg) Below limit Pass
E. coli Absent Pass
Salmonella Absent Pass
Staphylococcus aureus Absent Pass
Yeast & mould < 10 CFU/g Pass

How it's made

CREG+ is manufactured under cGMP (21 CFR Part 111), independently audited by Intertek, in an FDA-registered facility. (FDA-registered facility means the facility is registered with the FDA — it does not mean the product is "FDA approved," which no dietary supplement is.)

How to read a COA

A Certificate of Analysis is the lab record for a specific production batch. The number that matters most for creatine is the assay / content result — it confirms the product actually contains the dose on the label. For CREG+, that's a full 5 g of creatine monohydrate per sachet.

The results above are from a representative batch. The COA for your specific batch is tied to its batch number. These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.

✹ ATP ENERGY SYSTEM

Creatine Supports the Energy Behind Repeated Effort.

Creatine supports the rapid restoration of ATP — the fast energy your muscles use during high-intensity work.
That means better support for repeated effort, training output, and recovery between demanding sets.

CREG+ performance image creatine gel

Built for the Moment Effort Gets Hard.

When training demand rises, your body needs fast energy it can keep restoring. Creatine helps support that system — so repeated effort has something behind it.

✹ QUESTIONS, ANSWERED

Not the usual FAQ. The honest one.

Creatine supports one of the body’s fast-energy systems. During intense effort, your muscles use ATP quickly. Creatine helps restore ATP, supporting repeated output during lifting, sprinting, training, and hard sets.

Yes. Creatine monohydrate is absorbed through the small intestine regardless of the vehicle it arrives in. The gel base in CREG+ carries the same 5g dose through the same absorption pathway as powder mixed in water. What changes is the experience before ingestion — not the pharmacology after it.

Pilot data from gel and gummy-format creatine products shows comparable increases in blood creatine levels to powder. Powder may achieve peak blood concentration slightly faster on a given day, but long-term tissue saturation — which is what drives the actual outcomes — is determined by daily consistency, not absorption speed. The format that gets taken every day wins. Full stop.

Missing one day has negligible impact your muscle creatine stores don't deplete overnight. The half-life of creatine in muscle tissue is approximately 4 hours in blood, but stored phosphocreatine is retained in muscle for considerably longer. A single missed day is not a setback.

Where it costs you is pattern erosion. Missing three or four days across a week meaningfully slows saturation progress. Missing a full week which is very common with powder when travelling or off-routine, can require another 1–2 weeks just to return to where you were. The asymmetry matters: saturation builds slowly and requires deliberate consistency, but erosion happens passively. The goal of good format design is to make missing days structurally harder than taking the dose.

The mechanism is identical, but the baseline is different — and that gap matters. Research by Dr. Abbie Smith-Ryan (UNC Chapel Hill) established that women have approximately 70–80% lower endogenous creatine stores than men and consume less through diet. That means the upside from supplementation may be proportionally greater.

The evidence is particularly compelling for women during specific life stages: postpartum recovery, perimenopause and menopause transition, and periods of high psychological stress. During menopause especially, the cognitive benefits of creatine — attention, memory, processing speed — appear more pronounced, likely because declining oestrogen affects brain energy metabolism in ways that creatine can partially offset. The standard 5g daily dose applies equally regardless of sex.

5g is a practical daily amount commonly used for creatine maintenance. CREG+ uses creatine monohydrate because it is the most established and widely studied form of creatine.

Creatine is not an instant-effect supplement. It supports performance as stores build and are maintained over time. Some people notice changes within a few weeks; others notice the benefit through more consistent training output.

The short answer: one study, no replication, and a mechanism that doesn't hold under scrutiny. The concern originates from a single 2009 trial involving rugby players on a loading protocol, which found elevated DHT levels a hormone associated with male pattern baldness. The study did not measure hair loss directly, has never been replicated, and used dosages well above maintenance levels.

Multiple subsequent studies have found no link between creatine supplementation at standard doses (3–5g daily) and hair loss or DHT elevation. The International Society of Sports Nutrition has reviewed the evidence and found the claim unsupported. If you have a genetic predisposition to hair loss, the existing evidence does not suggest creatine accelerates it. This is one of the most persistent myths in sports nutrition, and the data doesn't support it.